@HopefulFutures I agree with you somewhat, though anyway, can you suggest how STX would be classified from our perspective as investment managers?
Usually we look at things from the perspective of the sector, then the Industry group, then the industry and sub-industry.
I have already posted this on several posts
https://www.iconomi.com/asset/DMINDEX?postId=d792d6b1-cf8b-4e49-ac6e-0cbb65284fe1
https://www.iconomi.com/asset/DMINDEX?postId=e07da214-de69-46df-bf61-8462f10f2bd6
https://www.iconomi.com/asset/DMINDEX?postId=4ce84409-a9ab-4e72-b0f2-952ec43888bd
Some examples to clarify the classification system further for you:
ARB, OP
Sector: Blockchain infrastructure.
Industry Group: Blockchain utilities.
Industry: Network scaling “Layer 2 scaling solution ”.
Sub-Industry: Optimistic Rollups.
LINK, PYTH
Sector: Blockchain infrastructure.
Industry Group: Computing.
Industry: Applications utilities.
Sub-Industry: Oracle.
MATIC
Sector: Blockchain infrastructure.
Industry Group: Blockchain utilities.
Industry: Network scaling “Layer-2 scaling side-chain solution”.
Sub-Industry: Side-chains.
IMX
Sector: Blockchain infrastructure.
Industry Group: Blockchain utilities.
Industry: Network scaling “Layer 2 scaling solution ”.
Sub-Industry: ZK-Rollup.
JASMY
Sector: Blockchain infrastructure.
Industry Group: Computing.
Industry: Information Technology
Sub-Industry: Internet of Things (IoT).
FIL
Sector: Blockchain infrastructure.
Industry Group: Computing.
Industry: Information Technology.
Sub-Industry: Compute & Private Storage - Shared Storage.
What do you suggest for the STX project to be accurate in my classification system.
The asset must be in one sector, one industry group, one industry and one sub-industry.
Glad to see someone thinking like me now 😂😂 Good luck bro🍀